Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42111430›Full record

ReviewLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2026

Demographic Factors in Pharyngoesophageal Segment Size: A Scoping Review.

Cade R McGarvey, Akhil Katragadda, Aarshvi Bhatt, Travis Jebackumar, Tae-Hee Kim, Zachary A Wykoff, Apoorva Ramaswamy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Cade R McGarveyUniversity of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences Toledo Ohio USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2528-564X
Akhil KatragaddaThe Ohio State University College of Medicine Columbus Ohio USA.
Aarshvi BhattUniversity of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences Toledo Ohio USA.
Travis JebackumarColumbia School of Medicine University of South Carolina Columbia South Carolina USA.
Tae-Hee KimThe Ohio State University College of Medicine Columbus Ohio USA.
Zachary A WykoffThe Ohio State University College of Medicine Columbus Ohio USA.
Apoorva RamaswamyDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center Columbus Ohio USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The Pharyngoesophageal Segment (PES) is situated at the junction of the pharynx and esophagus, regulating the passage of bolus from the pharynx into the esophagus during swallowing and preventing aspiration into the airway. Decreased opening of this sphincter can result in significant swallow impairment. Knowledge of normal PES size can be critical for diagnostic purposes and treatment planning. This systematic review seeks to aggregate the evidence correlating PES size with demographic factors, including age, sex, and obesity status. Data Sources: A search performed on PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Ovid included literature published before August 18, 2025. Review Methods: Inclusion criteria were healthy adult populations (including cadavers). Publications investigating only animal, pediatric, or pathologic populations or that did not include demographic comparisons were excluded. Results: A total of 5815 studies were retrieved, and 679 subjects across 10 studies met the inclusion criteria. Diverse parameters were measured, including PES area, diameter, lateral diameter, and anterior-posterior diameter. With varying parameters, different bolus sizes, and few papers, conclusive findings on PES size were not found. Studies that reported the mean size for each demographic group recorded a greater male PES size than female. The data conflicted regarding a greater PES size in elderly or non-elderly populations. Mean data regarding obesity and height were not reported but were noted not to significantly impact PES size. Conclusion: Many research gaps exist in defining normal PES size. Further research is needed to better elucidate issues like age-related differences, as well as measurement parameters and techniques.

Indexed as

fluoroscopypharyngoesophageal segmentsize demographicsstenosisupper esophageal sphincter

Identifiers

PMID42111430
PMCPMC13155938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.