ArticleERJ open research2026
Healthcare utilisation preceding the diagnosis of interstitial lung disease.
Article in ERJ open research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Diagnosis of interstitial lung disease (ILD) is frequently delayed, as symptoms are misattributed to other lung or cardiac diseases. Identifying prediagnostic patterns in healthcare utilisation may highlight areas of intervention leading to earlier diagnosis and treatment, potentially improving prognosis. We aimed to investigate healthcare utilisation in primary and secondary care in ILD patients compared to matched references over 10 years preceding the ILD diagnosis, using nationwide Danish registers and adjusting for comorbidities. Methods: We conducted a nationwide matched cohort study using data from national registers. The study population was patients with a first-time diagnosis of ILD between 1 January 2011 and 31 December 2019. Cases were matched with 10 references. Outcomes included number of hospital contacts, chest radiographs or computed tomography, and general practitioner consultations, spirometries, and C-reactive protein measurements. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) were calculated using multivariate negative binomial regression models, adjusted for socioeconomic factors and comorbidities. Results: We identified 13 161 cases with ILD, matched with 131 620 references. Mean±sd age at diagnosis was 68.4±13.9 years, with a slight male predominance. Most adjusted IRRs were elevated for up to 10 years preceding diagnosis, steadily increasing and sharply peaking 1 year prior to diagnosis. Similar patterns were seen when stratifying analyses for comorbidities. The adjusted IRRs were generally higher for patients without comorbidities. Conclusions: This nationwide study shows an increase in healthcare utilisation in both primary and secondary care in ILD patients up to 10 years before diagnosis, indicating a diagnostic delay longer than previously reported.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.