ArticleERJ open research2026
The construct validity of real-world digital mobility outcomes in people with COPD.
Article in ERJ open research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Validation of an Algorithmic Pipeline for Wrist-Worn Devices to Estimate Walking Speed in People with Multiple Long-Term Conditions.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Real-world walking and activity patterns in community-dwelling older adults: a cross-sectional analysis of baseline data from the SMART-AGE trial.European review of aging and physical activity : official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
34 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Recent advances in wearable technologies make it possible to accurately quantify real-world mobility performance through technically validated digital mobility outcomes (DMOs). The aim of the present study was to evaluate the construct validity (convergent, divergent, and known-groups validity) of 24 DMOs quantifying walking activity (amount and pattern) and gait (pace, rhythm and bout-to-bout variability) in people with COPD. Methods: Part of the Mobilise-D observational cohort study, people with COPD, recruited from seven European sites, wore an activity monitor for 7 days during daily life. Functional capacity, health status, dyspnoea, lung function, quadriceps torque and experience of difficulty with physical activity were used as constructs for convergent validity testing (Pearson/Spearman correlation coefficients). Diastolic blood pressure was used as an unrelated construct for divergent validity (criterion: |r|<0.2). Known-groups validity was evaluated across Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) stages (I-IV), GOLD ABE and modified Medical Research Council dyspnoea grades (linear models with p-for-trend). Results: 549 participants (37% females), had mean±sd age of 68±8 years, post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV Conclusions: Construct validity was supported for all walking activity (amount and pattern) DMOs, and most of the gait (pace, rhythm, and bout-to-bout variability) DMOs, indicating the clinical utility of these measures.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.