ReviewAllergologie select2026
Decoding allergy in vitro: Challenges and clinical use of humoral and cellular methods.
Review in Allergologie select, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In vitro assays are essential tools in diagnosing IgE-mediated allergic diseases and complement clinical history and skin testing across food, inhalant, venom, and drug allergies. This methodological review is intended for clinicians seeking a more detailed understanding of current laboratory-based allergy diagnostics. It summarizes current humoral and cellular diagnostic methods, including total IgE, singleplex and component-resolved specific IgE testing, multiplex IgE platforms, and functional cellular assays such as the basophil activation test and T-cell-based approaches. Humoral assays remain the quantitative foundation of molecular allergy diagnostics, while multiplex arrays broaden diagnostic scope and map sensitization profiles, although platform variability requires cautious interpretation. Cellular assays may add functional information in selected constellations but remain technically demanding, insufficiently standardized, and are best regarded as adjunctive tools in specialized or research settings, with evidence largely derived from selected cohorts. Additional areas - immunotherapy monitoring, mast cell disorders, contact allergy, and oncology - illustrate the broader methodological spectrum of in vitro methods. Persistent unmet needs include harmonization, validated reference standards, and robust interpretive frameworks. Disease-specific applications are discussed in companion articles in this issue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.