ArticleLiver cancer2026
Characterization of Patients with Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma in REFLECT Who Achieved Tumor Response or Alpha-Fetoprotein Response When Treated with Lenvatinib.
Article in Liver cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01761266 (A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label, Phase 3 Trial to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Lenvatinib), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label, Phase 3 Trial to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Lenvatinib (E7080) Versus Sorafenib in First-Line Treatment of Subjects With Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The phase 3 REFLECT study (NCT01761266) established lenvatinib's noninferiority to sorafenib for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). This subanalysis examines patients treated with lenvatinib according to the depth of their tumor response and their status as an alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) responder/nonresponder. Methods: Of 478 lenvatinib-treated patients, 194 achieved an objective response by mRECIST per independent imaging review. Patients with tumor response were further categorized by their maximal tumor reduction (assessed every 8 weeks). Patients were also assessed according to their AFP response (≥20% reduction from baseline by week 8) status, including AFP responders ( Results: Median duration of response in patients with ≥75% ( Conclusions: This analysis highlights the importance of tumor reduction and AFP response as predictors of survival outcomes in lenvatinib-treated patients with uHCC. These data continue to support lenvatinib as an effective first-line treatment option.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.