Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42111340›Full record

ArticleTrauma surgery & acute care open2026

Do tourniquets for extremity injuries save lives?

Taylor Miller, Travis Polk, Sharon M Henry

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Trauma surgery & acute care open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Taylor MillerR Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, Baltimore, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0342-4768
Travis PolkCombat Casualty Care Research Program, US Army Medical Research and Development Command, Fort Detrick, Maryland, USA.
Sharon M HenryProgram in Trauma, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3032-5880

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hemorrhage is the leading cause of preventable death in trauma, and tourniquets have become standard for extremity hemorrhage in both civilian settings and combat. Proponents argue that timely and properly applied tourniquets significantly improve survival in appropriately selected patients. Critics of frequent tourniquet use highlight the high rates of inappropriate application and associated complications, especially with prolonged use. Both sides agree that tourniquets can be lifesaving, but emphasize the need for proper training, appropriate use, and implementation of tourniquet conversion and replacement strategies. Evolving experience underscores the importance of adapting tourniquet use to modern battlefield and civilian realities. This manuscript summarizes a debate held at the 42nd Annual Point/Counterpoint Acute Care Surgery Conference regarding the benefits and risks of tourniquet use for extremity injuries.

Indexed as

hemorrhageMultiple TraumaTourniquetsWar-Related Injuries

Identifiers

PMID42111340
PMCPMC13150883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.