ArticleBrain circulation
Intelligent detection method for carotid atherosclerotic plaques based on ultrasound imaging.
Article in Brain circulation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe formation of carotid atherosclerotic plaques (CAP) is a major contributor to cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. Early detection and accurate identification of plaques are crucial for reducing the risk of these conditions. However, traditional CAP detection methods rely heavily on manual analysis by clinical experts and specific imaging equipment, which limits their feasibility for large-scale screening and automated processing. Therefore, developing efficient and automated methods for CAP detection holds significant clinical value.
methodsThis paper presents an intelligent CAP detection approach based on ultrasound imaging. By extracting texture and morphological features from the images, such as gray-level co-occurrence matrix, gray-level run length matrix, invariant moments, and fractal dimension, we construct a machine learning model using random forest (RF) and other algorithms to achieve accurate and efficient CAP detection. We evaluated the model's performance on a dataset of 2,786 ultrasound images acquired from various devices, employing five-fold cross-validation.
resultsThe experimental results indicate that the proposed machine learning model achieves high CAP detection accuracy across multiple classification metrics. The optimal RF model demonstrated an accuracy of 80%, a precision of 82%, a recall of 89%, a specificity of 75%, and an F1 score of 85%. Furthermore, feature importance analysis allows us to identify the ultrasound image features most relevant to CAP detection, enhancing the interpretability of our model.
conclusionThe machine learning model developed in this study effectively supports automated CAP detection and provides a reliable foundation for intelligent diagnosis using ultrasound imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.