Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42111238›Full record

ReviewClinical kidney journal2026

Ten tips on management of BK nephropathy in kidney transplant patients.

Colin C Geddes, Paul J Phelan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical kidney journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Colin C GeddesGlasgow Renal and Transplant Unit, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6747-6423
Paul J PhelanRenal Unit, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Management of BK virus after kidney transplantation remains challenging, as recently published updated guidelines identify ongoing gaps in the evidence. In this article we present tips for management based on evidence and clinical experience. Testing blood for BK virus by polymerase chain reaction should be part of the workup for any patient with significant deterioration in kidney transplant function. All kidney transplant biopsies should be tested by immunohistochemistry for the presence of SV40 large T antigen if there are features of tubulointerstitial inflammation on light microscopy. A transplant kidney biopsy that does not include medulla does not exclude BK virus-associated nephropathy (BKVAN). Tubulointerstitial inflammation with positive SV40 staining and undetectable BK virus in the blood implies a different polyomavirus nephropathy such as JC virus. Clinicians should consider the evidence carefully before deciding whether or not to adopt a BK viraemia screening strategy in their unit. If a strategy of screening for BK viraemia in the absence of transplant dysfunction is adopted, then it makes sense to target the first year and for screening to be at least every 4 weeks. The optimal reduction in immunosuppression in response to BK viraemia or BKVAN has not been established by clinical trials. A rapid decline in BK viral load after reduction in immunosuppression appears to be a strong risk factor for impending T cell-mediated rejection. Clinical trials of the addition of potentially effective anti-polyomavirus agents including leflunomide, fluoroquinolones, intravenous immunoglobulin concentrate, cidofovir and statins have not shown benefit. BK viraemia or BKVAN recurrence after viral clearance is rare.

Indexed as

acute rejectionBK viraemiaBK virus–associated nephropathyimmunosuppressionkidney transplantation

Identifiers

PMID42111238
PMCPMC13153466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.