ReviewClinical kidney journal2026
Ten tips on management of BK nephropathy in kidney transplant patients.
Review in Clinical kidney journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Management of BK virus after kidney transplantation remains challenging, as recently published updated guidelines identify ongoing gaps in the evidence. In this article we present tips for management based on evidence and clinical experience. Testing blood for BK virus by polymerase chain reaction should be part of the workup for any patient with significant deterioration in kidney transplant function. All kidney transplant biopsies should be tested by immunohistochemistry for the presence of SV40 large T antigen if there are features of tubulointerstitial inflammation on light microscopy. A transplant kidney biopsy that does not include medulla does not exclude BK virus-associated nephropathy (BKVAN). Tubulointerstitial inflammation with positive SV40 staining and undetectable BK virus in the blood implies a different polyomavirus nephropathy such as JC virus. Clinicians should consider the evidence carefully before deciding whether or not to adopt a BK viraemia screening strategy in their unit. If a strategy of screening for BK viraemia in the absence of transplant dysfunction is adopted, then it makes sense to target the first year and for screening to be at least every 4 weeks. The optimal reduction in immunosuppression in response to BK viraemia or BKVAN has not been established by clinical trials. A rapid decline in BK viral load after reduction in immunosuppression appears to be a strong risk factor for impending T cell-mediated rejection. Clinical trials of the addition of potentially effective anti-polyomavirus agents including leflunomide, fluoroquinolones, intravenous immunoglobulin concentrate, cidofovir and statins have not shown benefit. BK viraemia or BKVAN recurrence after viral clearance is rare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.