ReviewClinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology2026
Treatment of Generalized Granuloma Annulare with JAK Inhibitors: Systematic Review.
Review in Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Granuloma annulare (GA) is a rare granulomatous skin condition characterized by well-demarcated, annular, erythematous to skin-colored plaques. Treating GA, particularly generalized GA (GGA), remains challenging due to the lack of FDA-approved therapies and limited large-scale studies. Traditional treatments, including corticosteroids, phototherapy, and systemic agents such as antimalarials and antibiotics, have shown variable efficacy. Recent research highlights the role of the JAK-STAT pathway in GA pathogenesis, leading to interest in JAK inhibitors as a potential treatment. Emerging evidence suggests that JAK inhibitors may reduce inflammation and lesion burden in GGA. This manuscript evaluates the efficacy and safety of JAK inhibitors in the treatment of GGA. Results: Twenty-two studies were included, encompassing 50 patients with GGA. Agents included tofacitinib (n=27), baricitinib (n=11), upadacitinib (n=10), abrocitinib (n=1), and ruxolitinib (n=1). Across reports, most patients had recalcitrant disease with multiple prior treatment failures. Clinical improvement was observed in all patients, with complete response reported in 58.0% (29/50) and partial or near complete response in 42.0% (21/50). Median time to initial response was 5 weeks (IQR 2.75-8 weeks). Relapse occurred in a subset after discontinuation, but lesions often resolved with re-initiation. Adverse events were generally mild and consistent with known JAK inhibitor safety profiles (eg, hyperlipidemia, infections, herpes zoster). Conclusion: JAK inhibitors show promise as a targeted therapy for GGA, offering a novel approach for patients with refractory disease. Further studies, including clinical trials, are needed to establish long-term efficacy and safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.