Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42111234›Full record

Article... IEEE-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical and Health Informatics. IEEE-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical and Health Informatics2025

Personalized Case- and Evidence-Based TBI Prognosis with Small Language Models.

Pranav Manjunath, Syed M Adil, Benjamin D Wissel, Daniel P Sexton, Brian Lerner, Timothy W Dunn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ... IEEE-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical and Health Informatics. IEEE-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical and Health Informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pranav ManjunathDept. of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, USA.
Syed M AdilDept. of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, USA.
Benjamin D WisselDept. of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, USA.
Daniel P SextonDept. of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, USA.
Brian LernerDept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Duke University, Durham, USA.
Timothy W DunnDept. of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, USA.

Funding

Building and implementing a TBI prognostic model featuring real-time analysis of brain CT imagesR01NS123275 · NINDS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Timothy William Dunn · 2022 to 2026
$3.0M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS123275
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Timely and accurate emergency department disposition for traumatic brain injury patients requires rapid synthesis of complex, multimodal data. Yet in practice, such decisions often rely on heuristics, resulting in variable outcomes. While large language models show promise for supporting evidence-based practice, their clinical deployment is limited by size, cost, and privacy concerns. We present a dual retrieval-augmented framework that leverages efficient, on-premise small language models and unifies evidence-based practice with case-based reasoning to enable personalized disposition prediction of patients with traumatic brain injury. Evidence-based practice is modeled by retrieving guideline passages tailored to each patient's presentation, while case-based reasoning retrieves similar patients as few-shot exemplars. This dual-retrieval strategy personalizes both clinical guidelines and case-based exemplars, enabling the language model to produce predictions that integrate guideline alignment with patient-specific context. We implemented this framework using two open-source language models under 4B parameters-Phi-4-mini and Qwen-2.5. Across both models, similar patient exemplars consistently improved classification performance, increasing sensitivity without sacrificing specificity. Clinical guidelines had less impact on performance, but when combined with exemplars, they shifted predictions toward more conservative, guideline-consistent behavior. Clinician evaluations suggest that while adding similar patient exemplars enhances accuracy, overreliance on exemplars may diminish reasoning quality, whereas guidelines improve the clinical relevance and justification of model outputs. These findings underscore how targeted retrieval can personalize both predictions and their rationale, enhancing the performance, interpretability, and trust-worthiness of AI-assisted clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

Case-based ReasoningED DispositionEvidence-based PracticeSmall Language ModelsTraumatic Brain Injury

Identifiers

PMID42111234
PMCPMC13150833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.