ArticleSouthern African journal of infectious diseases2026
'
Article in Southern African journal of infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The burden of infections in dialysis facilities continues to rise worldwide. Due to the invasive procedures associated with haemodialysis (HD), patients undergoing HD in dialysis facilities are at high risk of acquiring bloodstream-related infections. Objective: The present study explored the practices of dialysis practitioners regarding the prevention of HD bloodstream-related infections at selected dialysis facilities in the City of Tshwane, Gauteng province, in South Africa. Methods: An exploratory-descriptive contextual qualitative study was conducted in five dialysis facilities utilising semi-structured interviews. Purposive sampling was conducted until data saturation was reached from 10 in-depth semi-structured interviews conducted with dialysis practitioners. Results: Data analysis was conducted concurrently with data collection using a qualitative thematic analysis approach, whereby Tesch's eight-step method was used to analyse the data. One theme, infection prevention challenges of dialysis practitioners, emerged with three subthemes: (1) in-service training, (2) shortage of resources and (3) colleagues' behaviors and practices. Conclusion: A lack of staffing, training and resources hinders the implementation of infection prevention and control (IPC) to ensure optimal care in dialysis facilities. These findings suggest that enhancing training programmes and promoting a culture of compliance with IPC protocols are crucial for improving patient safety and outcomes in dialysis settings. Contribution: This study highlights contextual insights into the infection prevention challenges faced by dialysis practitioners in South African dialysis facilities, highlighting critical gaps in training, resources and staff compliance that inform targeted interventions to reduce bloodstream infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.