ArticleEJHaem2026
Efficacy and Safety of Azacitidine Combined With Lisaftoclax in the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome With Increased Blasts.
Article in EJHaem, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To retrospectively analyze the early efficacy and safety of azacitidine plus lisaftoclax in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome with increased blasts (MDS-IB), providing a reliable clinical reference. Methods: A total of 17 patients admitted to the Department of Hematology between August 1 and December 31, 2025, were enrolled. The treatment was as follows: azacitidine 75 mg/m Results: Among nine AML patients, 55.6% achieved complete remission (CR) after one cycle, with 60.0% of responders being MRD-negative. Among eight MDS-IB patients, 62.5% achieved CR and 25.0% achieved hematologic improvement, with 40.0% of CR patients being MRD-negative. The median time to first CR was 1 month for both AML and MDS-IB patients. In the entire cohort, common Grade 3-4 adverse events included thrombocytopenia/leukopenia (58.8%), lymphopenia (47.1%), and febrile neutropenia (35.3%, AML: 22.2%, MDS-IB: 50.0%); no treatment-related deaths occurred. Median follow-up was 2.1 months; median OS was 1.9 months, and RFS was unevaluable. Conclusion: This regimen induces favorable responses with manageable toxicity, supporting its further investigation, while longer follow-up and larger prospective studies are required to confirm the long-term efficacy. Trial Registration: The authors have confirmed clinical trial registration is not needed for this submission.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.