ArticleThe international journal of bilingualism : cross-disciplinary, cross-linguistic studies of language behavior2026
Bilingual Narrative Development: Analyzing Sentences and Stories Within and Across Languages.
Article in The international journal of bilingualism : cross-disciplinary, cross-linguistic studies of language behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Aims and Objectives: Narrative samples provide an ecologically valid measurement of bilingual children's skills at the sentence (microstructure) and story levels (macrostructure). Cross-language transfer of narrative macrostructure would indicate that children can leverage their storytelling skills in one language to support storytelling in the other. A rigorous test of cross-language transfer needs to control for age and within-language microstructure skills. Methodology: We analyzed Spanish and English narrative retells produced by 109 typically developing bilingual participants, ages 5 to 7, using the Multilingual Assessment Instrument for Narratives (Gagarina et al., 2019). Microstructure measures included number of different words (NDW) and mean length of utterance in words (MLUw). Macrostructure was measured using the MAIN's goal-attempt-outcome (GAO) complexity rating. Data and analysis: To examine associations between L1 and L2 macrostructure, analyses included bivariate correlations and two hierarchical linear regressions predicting L1 and L2 macrostructure, respectively, with cross-language macrostructure, age, and microstructure measures as predictors. Findings/Conclusions: As anticipated, within-language microstructure contributed to macrostructure, suggesting that microstructure skills like vocabulary (e.g., NDW) are the strongest predictors of storytelling within each language. We also found bidirectional cross-language associations, with L1 macrostructure predicting L2 macrostructure and vice versa, even after controlling for the effects of age, L1 microstructure, and L2 microstructure. These cross-language associations indicate that storytelling may tap into underlying domain-general cognitive mechanisms (e.g., episodic memory and statistical learning). Originality: Few studies have accounted for microstructure and age effects when investigating cross-language transfer of narrative macrostructure in both L1 and L2. This study investigates cross-language transfer of macrostructure (MAIN GAO) while controlling for age and L1 and L2 microstructure (NDW and MLU), which resulted in bidirectional cross-language associations between L1 and L2 macrostructure. Implications: Robust vocabulary skills in the L1 and L2 can support narrative development within each language. Bidirectional cross-language associations in macrostructure suggest that storytelling reflects underlying cognitive mechanisms that are not language-specific.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.