Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42111198›Full record

ArticleiScience2026

Integrating multiple sensory modalities during dyadic interactions drives self-other distinction at the behavioral and electrocortical level.

Ugo Giulio Pesci, Giovanna Cuomo, Vanessa Era, Matteo Candidi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ugo Giulio PesciDepartment of Psychology, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Giovanna CuomoDepartment of Psychology, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Vanessa EraDepartment of Psychology, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Matteo CandidiDepartment of Psychology, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interpersonal motor interactions represent ecologically relevant dynamic contexts for studying behavioral and neural effects of active multisensory experiences. They offer the possibility to study cross-modal multisensory integration mechanisms and to test whether interpersonal interactions impact interpersonal cross-modal processing. Here we explored whether being engaged in interpersonal interactions that require the integration of different sensorimotor signals modulates interpersonal cross-modal integration after the interaction. In detail, we investigated whether engaging individuals in dyadic activities that utilized either single or combined sensory modalities would impact the behavioral and electrocortical markers associated with interpersonal cross-modal integration. We show that interactions requiring the integration of multiple sensory modalities lead to higher interpersonal differentiation resulting in reduced interpersonal cross-modal integration. Further, the neural patterns elicited by interpersonal visuo-tactile stimuli presented after interpersonal interactions that involved multiple sensory modalities were easier to recognize by a neural classifier. These findings suggest new avenues for sensorimotor approaches in social neuroscience, emphasizing the malleability of self-other representations based on the nature of interpersonal interactions.

Indexed as

neurosciencesensory neuroscience

Identifiers

PMID42111198
PMCPMC13156570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.