Expected level of target cues determines prospective memory strategic processing: The effect of task switching.

Wanqi Wang, Yaru Sun, Dongqing Li, Ning Chen, Wei Liu

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Wanqi WangSchool of Psychology, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, China.

Yaru SunSchool of Psychology, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, China.

Dongqing LiGuangnan Middle School, Jinhua, Zhejiang, China.

Ning ChenSchool of Psychology, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, China.

Wei LiuSchool of Psychology, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Target expectancy and task switching are pivotal in shaping prospective memory (PM). In two dual-task experiments (event-based,

Indexed as

cognitive neurosciencepsychology

Identifiers

PMID42111171

DOI10.1016/j.isci.2026.115712

PMCPMC13157007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY-NC

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.