ArticleResuscitation plus2026
Resuscitation needs justice: an intersectional view on justice, equity, diversity, and inclusion.
Article in Resuscitation plus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Disparities in cardiac arrest survival persist across gender, race, age, disability, socioeconomic status, and geographical location in part due to unequal access to life-saving interventions such as bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and early defibrillation. Inequities in access to training, equipment, and local implementation may reinforce these disparities across the chain of survival. Current diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) approaches to disparities in resuscitation research often examine inequities in isolation, limiting their ability to explain how structural, social, and institutional factors interact to influence outcomes. To address these limitations, this concept paper proposes examining the chain of survival through an intersectional lens, which considers Justice at the forefront of Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion (JEDI). Adding justice as an ethical principle aims to target these broader factors, and when combined with DEI efforts, may lead to a more comprehensive approach on examining inequities in resuscitation. Within the European Resuscitation Council (ERC), this intersectional JEDI lens provides a support for identifying inequities and barriers across both the chain of survival and the formula of survival, including medical science, educational efficiency, and local implementation, so that giving and receiving high-quality resuscitation becomes realistically attainable for everyone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.