ArticleJournal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions2026
Impact of Burr Speed and Polishing Run Sequences on Rotational Atherectomy Efficacy In Vitro.
Article in Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The impact of burr speed on rotational atherectomy (RA) mechanical efficacy remains debated. We aimed to analyze the effect of different RA protocols on postinterventional luminal gain. Methods: Procedures were performed in vitro on proximal left anterior descending artery with a 1.75-mm burr in a 3-dimensional-printed beating heart model. All lesions first underwent a high speed (HS; 180,000 revolutions per minute) pecking run followed by a HS polishing run of 30 seconds. This standard technique was completed by additional 30-second low speed (LS; 110,000 revolutions per minute) runs as follows: 1 (LS short group, n = 28 lesions); 2 (LS midgroup, n = 30 lesions), or 3 additional LS runs (LS long group, n = 27 lesions), while the control group (n = 27 lesions) received no additional polishing. An additional HS long group in which 3 additional 30-second HS polishing runs were delivered following the initial standard steps was also created (n = 27 lesions). The specimens were analyzed by microcomputed tomography scan to measure the average luminal volume (ALV) and minimal cross-section area. Results: The baseline lesion ALV and minimal cross -section area were and 128.57 mm Conclusions: These data suggest that additional polishing runs after standard RA procedure improves the debulked lesion volume, regardless of burr speed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.