Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42111094›Full record

ReviewJournal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions2026

Cardiogenic Shock and the Role of Critical Care Cardiology: Evidence, Models of Care, and Future Directions.

Alexandra N Schwann, Alexander Ambrosini, Tariq N Ali, Mark Jacobs, Ann Gage, David Dudzinski, P Elliott Miller

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alexandra N SchwannSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Alexander AmbrosiniSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Tariq N AliSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Mark JacobsSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Ann GageCentennial Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
David DudzinskiMassachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
P Elliott MillerSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The population found in today's cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) is strikingly different from that found in traditional coronary care units from decades ago, with increasing illness severity and higher prevalence of noncardiac critical illness. Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a heterogeneous syndrome commonly found in modern CICU with a variety of etiologies and presentations; despite advances in noninvasive monitoring and hemodynamic support, as well as efforts to standardize early identification and delivery of therapy, outcomes remain relatively poor. The establishment of critical care cardiology (CCC) as a distinct subspecialty was intended to address the acute needs of the patients in modern CICU, combining cardiovascular medicine expertise with the knowledge and skillset of a critical care intensivist to manage the spectrum of illnesses seen in modern CICU. With this dual expertise, the critical care cardiologist is uniquely positioned to coordinate multidisciplinary care for CS patients-integrating hemodynamic data, knowledge of multiorgan insult and failure driven by shock, procedural skill, and interpersonal influence to foster collaboration and timely decision-making within CS teams. This review aims to provide the history and development of CCC, discuss intensive care unit staffing models, and summarize the evidence supporting CS team utilization. Finally, we propose that continued investment in CCC training, research, and infrastructure is crucial to meet the demands of patients in the modern CICU.

Indexed as

cardiac intensive care unitcardiogenic shockcritical care cardiologyshock teams

Identifiers

PMID42111094
PMCPMC13154620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.