SynthesisFrontiers in neurology
Effect of occupational therapy on upper limb function and related rehabilitation outcomes after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Stroke is a major cause of disability worldwide, often leading to upper limb dysfunction, reduced daily living ability, and depression. Occupational therapy (OT) is recommended in rehabilitation guidelines, yet evidence on its comprehensive effects across physical and psychological outcomes in stroke survivors remains limited. Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to provide the most up-to-date and comprehensive evaluation of the effects of OT on upper limb function, daily living ability, and depressive symptoms in stroke patients. Method: Eight English and Chinese databases were searched to August 2025 for RCTs comparing OT with standard rehabilitation in stroke patients. Outcomes included upper limb function, ADL, and depressive symptoms. Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane tool, and certainty of evidence with GRADE. Meta-analyses were conducted in RevMan 5.4 and Stata 18.0, with sensitivity and subgroup analyses by intervention setting, OT type, and duration. The complete search strategies (full electronic search strings for each database) are provided in Appendix 2. Results: Twenty-two RCTs involving 2,833 stroke patients were included. Meta-analysis showed that OT significantly improved upper limb function (SMD = 1.42, 95% CI 0.62-2.21, Conclusion: OT significantly improves upper limb function, daily living ability, and depressive symptoms in stroke patients, with greater gains seen in longer-term and structured programs, supporting its integration into post-stroke rehabilitation. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD420251122701.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.