Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42111067›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology

Unusual presentation of a retrobulbar optic nerve sheath meningioma: a case report.

Johannes Robert Fleischer, Soroush Doostkam, Wolf Lagrèze

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Johannes Robert FleischerEye Center, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Soroush DoostkamMedical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Neuropathology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Wolf LagrèzeEye Center, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: We report a case of a slowly progressive unilateral visual field defect associated with an atypical retrobulbar optic nerve sheath lesion in the context of concurrent breast cancer, which was ultimately diagnosed as meningothelial meningioma. Case description: A 50-year-old woman presented with a 2-year history of painless, progressive visual impairment and a perceived altitudinal visual field defect in the left eye, with MRI revealing a retrobulbar T2-weighted hyperintense lesion of unclear nature in the setting of a recent diagnosis of breast carcinoma. Neuro-ophthalmic evaluation showed superonasal parapapillary retinoschisis, inferotemporal ganglion cell loss on OCT, and absolute superior scotoma on static perimetry, with preserved central visual acuity. To exclude metastatic disease and confirm the suspected diagnosis, an optic nerve sheath biopsy was performed, revealing WHO grade I meningothelial meningioma. Postoperatively, the visual field defect initially appeared enlarged. At the 1-week follow-up, there was reduced visual acuity and OCT findings consistent with a microvascular ischemic event, whereas the visual field defect returned to its preoperative pattern. Conclusion: This case highlights the diagnostic challenges of atypical retrobulbar optic nerve sheath lesions in the context of concurrent malignancy and underscores the feasibility and value of tissue diagnosis in selected patients to guide management.

Indexed as

biopsymeningiomaneuroopthalmologyoptic nerve sheathretrobulbar

Identifiers

PMID42111067
PMCPMC13149196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.