ArticleFrontiers in neurology
Unusual presentation of a retrobulbar optic nerve sheath meningioma: a case report.
Article in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: We report a case of a slowly progressive unilateral visual field defect associated with an atypical retrobulbar optic nerve sheath lesion in the context of concurrent breast cancer, which was ultimately diagnosed as meningothelial meningioma. Case description: A 50-year-old woman presented with a 2-year history of painless, progressive visual impairment and a perceived altitudinal visual field defect in the left eye, with MRI revealing a retrobulbar T2-weighted hyperintense lesion of unclear nature in the setting of a recent diagnosis of breast carcinoma. Neuro-ophthalmic evaluation showed superonasal parapapillary retinoschisis, inferotemporal ganglion cell loss on OCT, and absolute superior scotoma on static perimetry, with preserved central visual acuity. To exclude metastatic disease and confirm the suspected diagnosis, an optic nerve sheath biopsy was performed, revealing WHO grade I meningothelial meningioma. Postoperatively, the visual field defect initially appeared enlarged. At the 1-week follow-up, there was reduced visual acuity and OCT findings consistent with a microvascular ischemic event, whereas the visual field defect returned to its preoperative pattern. Conclusion: This case highlights the diagnostic challenges of atypical retrobulbar optic nerve sheath lesions in the context of concurrent malignancy and underscores the feasibility and value of tissue diagnosis in selected patients to guide management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.