Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42111062›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neurology

Modifying center of pressure to reduce fall risk in adult stroke survivors: a scoping review.

Jan A Kuipers, Norman Hoffman, Frederick R Carrick, Monèm Jemni

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jan A KuipersThe Carrick Institute, Cape Canaveral, FL, United States.
Norman HoffmanThe Carrick Institute, Cape Canaveral, FL, United States.
Frederick R CarrickThe Carrick Institute, Cape Canaveral, FL, United States.
Monèm JemniThe Carrick Institute, Cape Canaveral, FL, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Stroke survivors face a 73% fall rate within the first year after leaving the hospital. These falls cause serious injuries in 40% of cases and lead to healthcare costs of over $50 billion each year. Many of these falls are due to ongoing center of pressure (COP) abnormalities, such as velocity increases of 2-3 times normal levels, weight-bearing asymmetry exceeding 70%, and limits of stability reduced by 40-60%. These issues are often not addressed by standard rehabilitation. Although COP measurements provide objective indicators of fall risk, there has been no comprehensive review of interventions aimed at correcting these modifiable deficits. Objective: To systematically map the scope, variety, and characteristics of interventions aimed at adjusting COP variables in adult stroke survivors to reduce fall risk, while incorporating stakeholder insights on clinical implementation. Methods: We conducted a scoping review following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, searching PubMed, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Library from January 2015 to June 2025 for studies on COP-targeted interventions with fall-related outcomes. We extracted data on intervention details, COP parameters, measurement protocols, and clinical results. A diverse stakeholder panel of seven members, including stroke survivors, physiotherapists, and technology specialists, offered insights on implementation through structured consultations. Results: Nine studies with 306 participants mainly examined chronic stroke patients. The strongest evidence came from force-plate biofeedback across three studies, with effect sizes d = 0.52-0.84, showing consistent gains in sway velocity linked to a lower fall risk ( Conclusions: COP interventions show promising potential for addressing the hidden issue of post-stroke falls, with force-plate biofeedback being ready for careful clinical application.Success hinges on shifting from generic approaches to personalized rehabilitation that reveals and addresses subtle balance problems. The combination of moderate to large effect sizes and stakeholder-approved implementation strategies provides a clear path to transform these ongoing fall risks into confident community mobility. Nevertheless, realizing this potential requires coordinated efforts to standardize measurements, develop practical trials, and implement strategies across systems, balancing scientific rigor with clinical realities.

Indexed as

balance assessmentcenter of pressure (COP)falls preventionforce-plate biofeedbackpostural controlstroke rehabilitationweight-bearing asymmetry

Identifiers

PMID42111062
PMCPMC13149131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.