ArticleJournal of bone oncology2026
Age-related real-world treatment patterns and outcomes of localised, high-grade osteosarcoma.
Article in Journal of bone oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: There is currently no consensus regarding the standard treatment for osteosarcoma arising in middle-aged and older patients. We aimed to evaluate real-world treatment patterns and oncological outcomes using a nationwide Japanese database and to clarify optimal age-adapted treatment strategies. Methods: A total of 871 patients with localised, high-grade osteosarcoma registered between 2011 and 2020 in the Japanese Bone and Soft Tissue Tumour Registry were analysed. Treatment patterns and disease-specific survival (DSS) were evaluated according to age groups (≤ 40 years, n = 615; 41-64 years, n = 154; and ≥ 65 years, n = 102). Results: Trunk tumours were significantly more frequent in patients aged 41-64 (30%) and ≥ 65 years (40%) than in those aged ≤ 40 years (5%). Definitive surgery rates decreased with age (98%, 91%, and 85%, respectively). Perioperative chemotherapy was administered in 92%, 79%, and 34% of patients, with reduced use of methotrexate and cisplatin in patients aged > 40 years. Multivariable analysis identified age ≥ 65 years, absence of surgery, palliative chemotherapy, and adjuvant or palliative radiotherapy as adverse prognostic factors. The 5-year DSS was 79%, 62%, and 45% in patients aged ≤ 40, 41-64, and ≥ 65 years, respectively ( Conclusion: Wide/radical resection combined with perioperative chemotherapy remains the mainstay of treatment regardless of age in osteosarcoma management. The optimal sequencing of chemotherapy and surgery warrants a prospective international collaborative study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.