ArticleBiomedical optics express2026
Peripheral refractive errors in pseudophakic eyes:
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Impact of peripheral optical errors in age-related macular degeneration.Journal of optometryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We present a systematic assessment of peripheral refractive errors in pseudophakic eyes. Optical bench measurements were performed using a physical eye model to characterize the peripheral cylinder of eight different intraocular lens (IOL) models of approximate power 20 D, covering different IOL types (monofocal, enhanced monofocal, extended depth of focus, bifocal, trifocal) and technologies (refractive, diffractive, wavefront-shaping) from several manufacturers. In addition, optical simulations were done for average and personalized pseudophakic eye models. Peripheral cylinder at 20° visual field was similar for all IOLs (range -2.24 to -2.87 D). Simulations in average eye models further showed the peripheral cylinder to be independent of pupil size, retinal radius of curvature (ROC), and IOL technology (-2.31 to -2.62 D across all conditions). Peripheral blur parameter (range 1.24 to 2.03 D across all conditions) showed small variations with IOL technology and ROC but negligible change with different pupil sizes. For simulations with personalized eye models, the peripheral cylinder and blur showed small variation across different IOL technologies.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.