ArticleBiomedical optics express2026
Robust registration under large image misalignment using an iterative step-aware transformer with application to corneal confocal microscopy.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Corneal Innervation Research at a Crossroads: A Tool-Driven Roadmap for the Future.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Review
- Image stitching for probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy via a motion consistency constraint.Biomedical optics express · 2026Article
- Robust registration under large image misalignment using an iterative step-aware transformer with application to corneal confocal microscopy.Biomedical optics express · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) captures high-resolution images of the subbasal nerve plexus (SNP), but its small field of view limits visualization of larger anatomical landmarks such as the corneal whorl, which may aid in disease differentiation. Intra-modality image frame registration is, therefore, a critical step toward high-quality mosaic construction. However, raster scanning required for mosaicking in CCM is still performed manually, often leading to irregular coverage and substantial frame misalignment. This creates a challenge as existing deep learning methods largely focus on local elastic deformation, which is less relevant in CCM due to contemporaneous acquisition and local linearity, while paying limited attention to robust affine registration under large misalignment. To address this, we propose a hybrid cross- and self-attention transformer-based registration network that explicitly models long-range spatial correspondences, enabling robust affine alignment even under challenging conditions. To further enhance robustness, we introduce the Iterative Step-Aware Transformer Registration Network (ISATR-Net), which progressively reduces residual misalignment through step-aware conditioning. To rigorously evaluate this problem under the clinical diversity encountered in real-world CCM imaging, we curated a new CCM dataset. The dataset includes 156 eyes from 91 patients, spanning dry eye disease, neuropathic corneal pain, penetrating keratoplasty, uveitis, Fuchs corneal dystrophy, and control cases, totaling 1,349 image frame registration pairs. On this dataset, ISATR-Net outperforms multiple state-of-the-art affine registration methods. Our open-source codes are available online.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.