ArticleBiomedical optics express2026
Detecting multiple fiducial markers from a camera seismocardiogram.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Seismocardiogram (SCG) records the cardiac contractions and valve functions, holding a promising avenue for the early detection of adverse cardiovascular events. To monitor such events, it is crucial to accurately identify the fiducial markers in the SCG signal in order to support the estimation of hemodynamic parameters. In this paper, we propose a novel framework that consists of a defocused camera-based speckle imaging system to measure the SCG signal and a deep learning based model (DiAT) to detect multiple fiducial markers. Specifically, DiAT employs dilated convolution and a multi-head attention mechanism to capture the temporal context of SCG signals for detecting seven fiducial markers (MC, IM, AO, IC, RE, AC, MO). The percentage of predicted values falling in the range of true values ± 1 ms, and the Mean Absolute Error (MAE) between the predicted value and the true value are used as evaluation metrics. Experiments involving 17 adult subjects with ice water stimulation protocol show that DiAT obtains 87.78% accuracy and 8.4106 ms MAE. It demonstrates that our proposed method has reliable performance in detecting seven fiducial markers of camera-SCG signals.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.