ReviewCardiac failure review2026
Comprehensive Management of Hyperkalaemia in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease and Cardiovascular Conditions: Expert Recommendations from Mexico.
Review in Cardiac failure review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients with chronic kidney disease and/or cardiovascular disease are at heightened risk of developing hyperkalaemia. This electrolyte disorder is prevalent and, if left untreated, typically results in fatal outcomes. The implementation of standardised, specialised management strategies represents a valuable tool for clinicians in the care of these patients. The primary objective of this study is to present a consensus document for the management of hyperkalaemia of cardiorenal origin, developed by a group of experts in cardiology and nephrology, opinion leaders in Mexico. To this end, a Delphi panel was formed, comprising a group of cardiologists and a group of nephrologists, each coordinated by a leader who concentrated the information. The panellists responded to a questionnaire that was sent to them. In a virtual meeting, the responses were reviewed and a consensus was reached by all participants based on the current literature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.