ArticleAsian journal of neurosurgery2026
An Observational Study to Identify Various Prognostic Factors in Spinal Metastatic Disease in Northern India.
Article in Asian journal of neurosurgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Spinal metastatic disease is a common complication in cancer patients, leading to significant morbidity and mortality. These metastases are more frequently found in the bones and may present with symptoms of spinal canal invasion and cord compression. Understanding the prognostic factors influencing outcomes in spinal metastatic disease is crucial for optimizing treatment strategies and improving patient quality of life. Objective: This study aims to identify and analyze various prognostic factors, including treatment modality (surgical vs. conservative), affecting the clinical outcomes in patients with spinal metastatic disease. Materials and Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted at a tertiary care center on 50 patients diagnosed with spinal metastatic disease for a year. Data collected included demographic information, primary cancer type, site of primary cancer, neurological status at presentation, treatment modalities employed, and overall survival. Prognostic factors were evaluated using appropriate tests, and data analysis was performed using SPSS software. Results: The mean age of the patients was 60.7 years, with a male-to-female ratio of 1.4:1. The most common primary cancers were breast (21), lung (17), liver (8), and prostate (4). Key prognostic factors identified included sex (females having a good outcome), number of visceral metastases ≤ 1, hemoglobin, albumin, Karnofsky Performance Status score, pretreatment Klekamp score, and management (surgery). Conclusion: This study identifies several critical prognostic factors in spinal metastatic disease, including neurological status at presentation, primary tumor type, and treatment modality. These factors should be considered when developing individualized treatment plans for patients with spinal metastatic disease to improve survival and quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.