ArticleAsian journal of neurosurgery2026
Sutured versus Sutureless Dural Substitutes: Experience from a Government Tertiary Care Hospital in India.
Article in Asian journal of neurosurgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Dural substitutes have emerged as favorable alternatives to autologous grafts. This shift in approach is evident in the growing use of sutureless grafts (e.g., DuraGen) over traditional sutured options (e.g., bovine pericardial patch). This study was conducted to gain insights into the choice between the two in terms of the rate of postoperative complications. Materials and Methods: This prospective study was conducted between May 15, 2023 and January 31, 2024 at a tertiary-care government hospital in India. The patients received sutured (bovine pericardial patch) or sutureless (DuraGen patch) dural substitutes. Success in both groups was defined by the absence of postoperative complications. Wound healing was evaluated on postoperative day (POD) 3, 10, and 14. Follow-up assessments occurred at 1 and 3 months. Cerebrospinal fluid pooling was assessed by computed tomography (immediately after surgery and on POD 10) and brain magnetic resonance imaging (after 1 month). Results: A total of 50 patients received sutured (bovine pericardial patch; Conclusion: Sutureless grafts like DuraGen offer rapid application, reduced infection risk, and suitability for complex areas like the skull base. Sutured grafts may be preferred for larger defects due to their adaptability and inherent strength.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.