Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42110932›Full record

ReviewAsian journal of neurosurgery2026

Controversies in Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Review.

Vengalathur Ganesan Ramesh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Asian journal of neurosurgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Vengalathur Ganesan RameshDepartment of Neurosurgery, Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute, Chettinad Academy of Research and Education, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID 0000-0002-5986-6314

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is an area full of controversies. The anatomical distribution of various sensory fibers in the sensory root of the trigeminal nerve at the root entry zone (REZ), the classification of TN, clinical features to differentiate from other facial pain syndromes, pathogenesis of TN, the plethora of treatment modalities for the medically intractable TN with their relative merits and demerits, are an interesting area of study. Understanding these aspects will help us to find concrete answers to these various issues. Dandy's concept of accessory fascicles near the trigeminal REZ, which carry the touch and proprioceptive fibers, paved the way for partial sensory rhizotomy by posterior fossa approach. Similarly, Jannetta's concept of microvascular compression at the REZ paved the way for the popular microvascular decompression surgery. The search for less risky, less invasive procedures has paved the way for the various percutaneous procedures and radiosurgery for intractable TN. But all the procedures have their share of complications and recurrence rates. Still, despite several theories and concepts, the exact pathogenesis of TN remains unclear. More research is needed to find the exact pathogenesis of TN and also a minimally invasive procedure without any recurrence of pain for medically intractable TN.

Indexed as

controversies in trigeminal neuralgiapathogenesis of trigeminal neuralgiatreatment of trigeminal neuralgiatrigeminal neuralgiatrigeminal neuralgia classification

Identifiers

PMID42110932
PMCPMC13155919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.