ArticlePalliative care and social practice2026
Challenges, care gaps, and coping mechanisms in patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers following palliative gastrointestinal surgery.
Article in Palliative care and social practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Palliative gastrointestinal surgery improves symptoms and health-related quality of life in patients who present with complications from advanced cancer. However, palliative surgery near the end-of-life is associated with significant physiological and psychological stressors for both patients and their caregivers. Yet literature on patient and caregiver centric narratives following surgery remains limited. Objectives: We aim to explore challenges, perceived care gaps, and coping mechanisms of patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers following palliative gastrointestinal surgery. Design & methods: We conducted qualitative in-depth interviews with 25 purposively sampled patients with advanced cancer and 13 caregivers following palliative gastrointestinal surgery. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and thematically analyzed. Results: There were four major themes that identified as challenges and perceived care gaps among patients and caregivers: (1) physical, emotional, and systemic challenges of living with a stoma after palliative gastrointestinal surgery, (2) emotional, existential, and relational challenges of living with advanced cancer, (3) navigating uncertainty amid suboptimal surgical communication, and (4) emotional and relational strain from lack of compassionate surgical care. Four themes identified as coping mechanisms: (1) emotion- (2) meaning-, (3) problem- and (4) avoidance-focused coping. Conclusion: Patients and caregivers face multifaceted challenges related to the impact of gastrointestinal surgery and their life-limiting advanced cancer condition. They also perceive significant gaps in surgical care delivery. Our findings shed light on unmet needs among patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers, highlighting opportunities for targeted intervention to improve the quality of surgical care delivery following palliative surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.