ArticleCirculation reports2026
Machine Learning Models Incorporating Nursing Care Needs to Predict 180-Day Prognosis in Patients With Heart Failure: Validation With Discrimination and Calibration Analyses.
Article in Circulation reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The number of patients with heart failure (HF) is increasing with aging of the population, resulting in a shift in care from hospitals to community settings. Although predicting medium-term prognosis after discharge could improve community-based management and reduce readmissions, no established model has integrated structured multidimensional assessments into HF prognostic modeling. Methods and Results: This multicenter study developed and validated machine learning (ML) models (i.e., logistic regression, random forest, extreme gradient boosting, and light gradient boosting) to predict 180-day mortality or emergency hospitalization in 4,904 patients with HF. Patients were randomly divided into training and validation sets (8 : 2). Nursing care needs, derived from structured nursing assessments that capture patients' physical status and care dependency, were included as a predictive feature. All models demonstrated acceptable discriminative performance based on the area under the precision-recall curve, favorable calibration assessed by the calibration slope and Brier score, and effective risk stratification. The Shapley additive explanations algorithm identified nursing care needs as an important prognostic factor, alongside established laboratory variables for HF prognosis. Conclusions: ML models incorporating nursing care needs effectively predicted the 180-day prognosis of patients with HF. The prominent contribution of nursing care needs underscores the value of incorporating structured multidimensional care-related information into prognostic modeling and highlights the importance of team-based post-discharge HF management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.