ArticleThe South African journal of physiotherapy2026
Clinical reasoning in intensive care: Insights from novice and expert physiotherapists.
Article in The South African journal of physiotherapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Clinical reasoning in the intensive care unit (ICU), a complex, high-acuity and stressful environment, may require a different set of critical thinking and decision-making approaches to undergraduate physiotherapy student training in this setting that needs to be explored. Objectives: To explore clinical reasoning processes of undergraduate physiotherapy students (novices) and clinicians (experts) in ICU settings in the Western Cape. Method: A qualitative exploratory study using semi-structured interviews with purposively sampled participants: seven final-year physiotherapy novices and four physiotherapy clinicians with over 5 years of ICU experience. Data were analysed using Braun and Clarke's six-phase thematic content analysis. Results: Both novice and expert physiotherapists described using information gathering, assessment planning, and hypothesis formulation from medical folder reviews and objective assessments to guide critical thinking and decision-making in ICU care. Experienced clinicians relied on the International Classification of Function framework and extensive ICU exposure to strengthen their reasoning. Novice physiotherapists reported that theory and its application supported their clinical reasoning, but their effectiveness was limited by the complex, high-pressure ICU environment, emotional burden of critically ill and end-of-life care, and feelings of overwhelm, fear, stress, anxiety and limited experience. Conclusion: The study highlights shared foundations but clear differences in the depth of clinical reasoning between novice and expert physiotherapists, with clinicians' greater experience and situational familiarity enabling more advanced reasoning in ICU care. Clinical implications: Structured ICU exposure, emotional support and guided reasoning frameworks are needed to help novice physiotherapists apply theory effectively in high-pressure ICU settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.