ArticleThe South African journal of physiotherapy2026
Co-creating learning: A qualitative exploration of physiotherapy clinical education.
Article in The South African journal of physiotherapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: A large part of physiotherapy clinical training is situated in the workplace. Learning in an authentic environment is supported by facilitators. Objectives: This study focussed on the perceptions and understanding of physiotherapy students and facilitators while learning on the clinical platform. Method: A qualitative methodology within an interpretivist paradigm was followed using convenience sampling. Results: Physiotherapy students ( Conclusion: Across themes, learning was shaped by how students and facilitators understood and enacted their roles, the degree to which student agency was recognised and supported, and how relational safety and environmental constraints mediated engagement. Implicit and sometimes misaligned expectations between students and facilitators influenced whether learning opportunities were taken up or constrained. Clinical learning emerged as a co-constructed, relational process rather than a unidirectional transfer of knowledge. Clinical Implications: Supporting meaningful learning in the clinical environment requires greater attention to implicit expectations, relational dynamics and the conditions under which student agency can be enacted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.