Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42110791›Full record

ArticleACS omega2026

An Automated HPLC Method for SARA Fractionation of Asphalts: Operational Assessment and Comparison with ASTM D4124.

Giovanni Polacco, Sara Filippi, Chiara Riccardi, Pietro Leandri, Massimo Losa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Giovanni PolaccoDepartment of Civil and Industrial Engineering, University of Pisa, Largo Lucio Lazzarino, 1, 56122 Pisa, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9897-8829
Sara FilippiDepartment of Civil and Industrial Engineering, University of Pisa, Largo Lucio Lazzarino, 1, 56122 Pisa, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9772-7254
Chiara RiccardiDepartment of Civil and Industrial Engineering, University of Pisa, Largo Lucio Lazzarino, 1, 56122 Pisa, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4828-4850
Pietro LeandriDepartment of Civil and Industrial Engineering, University of Pisa, Largo Lucio Lazzarino, 1, 56122 Pisa, Italy.
Massimo LosaDepartment of Civil and Industrial Engineering, University of Pisa, Largo Lucio Lazzarino, 1, 56122 Pisa, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The composition of asphalts and other heavy petroleum-derived materials is usually subdivided into four fractions called saturates, aromatics, resins, and asphaltenes (SARA), which have different polarities and solubilities. The separation and quantification of these fractions using chromatographic methods provide essential information on the colloidal stability, chemical reactivity, and processing behavior. However, the measured distribution of SARA fractions is inherently dependent on the analytical procedure adopted. Based on a liquid chromatographic separation in open columns, ASTM D4124 is still the most widely applied standard, despite being time-consuming, solvent-intensive, and operator-dependent. Although numerous HPLC-based alternatives have been proposed, their broader implementation has been limited by the methodological variability and the lack of a clear framework for interpreting the results across different separation schemes, particularly for asphaltic systems rich in aromatics, resins and asphaltenes. This work presents an automated HPLC workflow for SARA fractionation which is applied to four different penetration-grade asphalts and systematically compared to ASTM D4124. The study highlights the practical aspects of HPLC implementation, including the critical methodological steps that affect the reproducibility and transferability between laboratories. Additional analyses of ASTM-isolated fractions and selected model compounds provide insights into the origins of systematic differences between HPLC- and ASTM-derived SARA compositions. These differences are shown to arise from distinct separation mechanisms and operational cut points rather than from analytical inaccuracies. This reflects the intrinsically method-dependent nature of SARA classification in materials characterized by a continuous distribution of molecular polarity. By clarifying the methodological and conceptual basis of these differences, this work provides practical guidance for the interpretation of HPLC-SARA data and supports more consistent and transferable approaches to asphalt characterization.

Identifiers

PMID42110791
PMCPMC13150767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.