ArticleACS omega2026
Performance of Coating Mortars with Partial Replacement of Natural Aggregate by Açaí Seed Residual Ash from the Amazon Region.
Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluated external rendering mortars with partial replacement of natural sand by açaí seed residual ash (ASRA). Initially, through a pilot study, mortars containing 0, 10, 20, and 30% ASRA were tested, analyzing their properties in both fresh and hardened states. Considering the demand for sustainable solutions for agro-industrial residues, this research aims to corroborate, with technical and scientific evidence, the feasibility of using ASRA as a substitute for sand in mortars. Based on the pilot study analysis, it was found that the mixture with 20% replacement (ASRA20) exhibited the best rheological and mechanical performance. Subsequently, an external rendering mortar with 20% ASRA was produced and compared, in terms of performance, with a reference mortar widely used in Brazil (plasticized mortar without ash). Both mortars (REF and ASRA20) were applied to vertical masonry panels built with ceramic blocks, where the following aspects were assessed: cracking, surface friability, permeability, and direct tensile bond strength. In addition, microstructural analyses were carried out using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP). The results, analyzed through statistical methods, demonstrated that the ASRA20 mortar presented improved particle cohesion, higher plasticity, a lower cracking index, greater resistance to surface wear (scratch test), reduced permeability, and bond strength values exceeding the requirements established by standards. These findings indicate that ASRA has strong potential for application in cementitious matrices, contributing to the reuse of an abundant residue from the Amazon region and providing a sustainable alternative for construction materials.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.