Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42110720›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2026

Vibrotactile augmentation enhances late-phase control in sequential reaching without accuracy costs.

Saba Mohammadalinezhad Kolahdouz, Quinn Malone, Steven R Passmore, Jonathan J Marotta, Cheryl M Glazebrook

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Saba Mohammadalinezhad KolahdouzPerceptual Motor Integration Lab, Applied Health Sciences, Faculty of Kinesiology and Recreation Management, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Quinn MaloneSensorimotor Physiology and Integrative Neuromechanics, Faculty of Health and Social Development, School of Health and Exercise Sciences, University of British Columbia, Okanagan, Kelowna, BC, Canada.
Steven R PassmorePerceptual Motor Behavior Lab, Faculty of Kinesiology and Recreation Management, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Jonathan J MarottaPerception and Action Lab, Psychology, Faculty of Arts, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Cheryl M GlazebrookPerceptual Motor Integration Lab, Applied Health Sciences, Faculty of Kinesiology and Recreation Management, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Sequential goal-directed movements require the integration of advance planning and online control processes. However, the extent to which augmented sensory feedback influences these processes across multiple movement segments remains unclear. Vibrotactile and auditory feedback may enhance motor control by providing additional sensory information during movement execution, particularly in complex sequential tasks. Methods: Twenty-four neurotypical adults (mean age 27.04 ± 5.31 years) performed one-target and four two-target reaching tasks involving single- and bimanual movements with extension and reversal components. Participants completed the tasks under three sensory conditions: no feedback, auditory feedback, and vibrotactile feedback delivered at first target contact. Reaction time, movement time, spatial accuracy, and kinematic measures including peak velocity and time after peak velocity were analyzed using repeated-measures analyses of variance. Results: Reaction time was significantly influenced by both sensory condition and target task complexity, with faster movement initiation observed in the no-feedback condition and during less complex movement sequences. Sensory condition did not significantly affect overall movement time or spatial accuracy. However, vibrotactile feedback significantly reduced time after peak velocity during the second movement segment, indicating enhanced late-phase control without compromising accuracy. Target task complexity also significantly modulated kinematic control, particularly during bimanual reversal movements. Discussion: These findings demonstrate that vibrotactile feedback selectively enhances deceleration-related control during sequential reaching movements, supporting its role as an effective sensory augmentation strategy for improving movement efficiency in complex motor tasks. Such low-cost sensory interventions may have practical implications for enhancing motor performance in populations experiencing age-related or neurological declines in sensorimotor function.

Indexed as

auditory stimulationcoordinationkinematicsmotor activitysensory integrationvibration

Identifiers

PMID42110720
PMCPMC13153064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.