ArticleJournal of education & teaching in emergency medicine2026
A Novel Low-Cost Phantom for Ultrasound-Guided Fascia Iliaca Nerve Blocks.
Article in Journal of education & teaching in emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Audience: This phantom is designed to instruct emergency medicine residents in ultrasound-guided fascia iliaca (FI) nerve blocks but could also be used for medical students and attending physicians. Introduction: Ultrasound-guided regional nerve blocks are increasingly used in the emergency department for pain management. The FI block, used for pain management in patients with hip fractures, have been shown to provide pain relief for up to eight hours with rare complications and to decrease need for parenteral pain medication.1,2 It is considered best practice to train physicians in ultrasound-guided procedures such as FI blocks by using phantoms, which are objects designed to mimic human tissue and anatomy relevant to the specific ultrasound-guided procedure. Commercial trainers are available but are quite expensive with those designed to mimic femoral anatomy priced at or over $5,000 USD, and they still lack some of the anatomical landmarks useful in FI blocks.3,4 Several lower cost FI models have been described made from a variety of perishable items including gelatin, tofu, chicken, konnyaku jelly, pork and meat glue.5-10 However, these models have the downside of limited uses due to the nature of perishable materials, and most are also lacking in block specific landmarks and durability. Educational Objectives: By the end of the training session using the FI phantom and bedside ultrasound, learners should be able to: 1) discuss indications, contraindications, and complications of FI blocks; 2) identify anatomy relevant to performing an FI block on ultrasound; and 3) independently perform an FI block or demonstrate proper needle position for FI block on ultrasound of the phantom. Educational Methods: This low-cost FI block phantom was developed using ballistics gel to create the fascia layers and muscles, bungee cord for nerve, and latex balloons for vessels. Ballistics gel was also used as the base medium for the phantom. Research Methods: Participants completed a short electronic survey following the educational session using five-point Likert scale questions to evaluate the phantom based on ultrasound image quality, anatomical accuracy, and perceived durability. An additional question asked participants if they felt more confident performing an FI block after practicing on the phantom. Results: Twenty-four emergency medicine residents completed the training session and the post-training survey. All learners were able to successfully demonstrate proper needle placement on ultrasound for the FI block. On a five-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (very poor) to 5 (excellent), participants rated the phantom in durability, anatomical accuracy, and ultrasound image quality. Most participants agreed that the phantom was anatomically accurate (median 4) and durable (median 4). The phantom performed the best in the category of ultrasound image quality (median 5). Most participants agreed that practicing with the phantom increased their confidence in performing FI blocks (median 4). The phantom held up to 100 needle sticks with only mild degradation in image quality. Discussion: The phantom presented here effectively taught EM residents proper needle placement for an FI block since all participants were able to demonstrate appropriate needle placement. The phantom was low cost, particularly compared to commercial trainers, and held up to a large number of needle sticks. Topics: Nerve blocks, ultrasound phantom, pain management, hip fractures, point of care ultrasound.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.