Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42110691›Full record

ArticleJournal of education & teaching in emergency medicine2026

OptimEYEzing Emergency Skills: A Novel Model for Ocular Procedural Education for Emergency Medicine Residents.

Carrie Maupin, Ambika Anand, Grace Hickam, Stephen Miller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of education & teaching in emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Carrie MaupinVirginia Commonwealth Univrsity School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Richmond, VA.
Ambika AnandVirginia Commonwealth Univrsity School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Richmond, VA.
Grace HickamVirginia Commonwealth Univrsity School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Richmond, VA.
Stephen MillerVirginia Commonwealth Univrsity School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Richmond, VA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Audience: This model for ocular procedural education is designed to instruct emergency medicine residents of all levels of training. Introduction: Ocular complaints are a common presentation to the emergency department (ED) with some studies quoting as many as two to three million ocular-related visits annually.1,2 These complaints can range from minor issues, such as corneal abrasions, to more serious conditions that require prompt evaluation and management, such as retrobulbar hematomas. Emergency medicine physicians are often the first-line providers assessing these complaints, so it is imperative that they feel adept in recognizing and managing these complaints.2Despite the frequency of ocular-related visits, ophthalmologic training among emergency medicine residents is often limited. Studies have reported that residents receive less than ten hours of formal ophthalmology training throughout their residency.2,3 One study revealed that many emergency medicine physicians in the United States are not confident in using basic ophthalmic tools, conducting eye exams, diagnosing ophthalmic complaints, or performing vision-saving procedures.2 This lack of formal training makes it difficult for residents to confidently diagnose and manage ocular conditions in the emergency department, both during residency and in their future practice. On review of the literature, there have been developments of procedural models for the practice of ophthalmology skills including removal of corneal foreign bodies utilizing swine eyes, tonometry using water balloons, and lateral canthotomy using a cadaver eye.4.5 However, cadavers can be very difficult to obtain, and expensive and swine eyes are not reusable or easy to store.There is a need for cost-effective, hands-on, ocular training models to help bridge this learning gap and increase residents' comfort with common ocular complaints and procedures - including foreign body removal, lateral canthotomy, fluorescein staining, and intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements. Integrating hands-on ocular training models into medical education can ultimately lead to better patient outcomes. Educational Objectives: By the end of this session, learners will be able to: 1) identify signs and symptoms of ocular emergencies, 2) appraise for indications to perform ocular procedures, 3) demonstrate procedural competence in ocular foreign body removal, fluorescein staining, lateral canthotomy, and intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements, 4) relate increased procedural confidence with ocular procedures. Educational Methods: We developed two gelatin-based eye models that are low-cost and can be easily replicated. The first was created with Knox Research Methods: Twenty-one residents, ranging from their first year of training to their third year of training, participated in the session. A pre-survey was administered to all participants (supplemental materials). The pre-survey was broken down into each ocular procedure listed above, and the participants were asked if 1) they had ever performed the procedure, 2) if they had ever consulted ophthalmology for assistance with the procedure, and 3) to rate their comfort level with the procedure using a Likert scale (1=not at all comfortable to 5=very comfortable). After completion of the session, a post-survey (supplemental materials) was administered to participants, again broken down by each ocular procedure, asking 1) to rate their comfort level with the procedure using the same Likert scale and 2) if they would plan to consult ophthalmology for assistance with the procedure in the future.Variables were summarized using percentages and frequencies for categorical variables, and means and ranges for continuous variables were presented. Using an α-value of 0.05, a T-test for independent samples was performed to determine if a difference between comfort levels before and after each activity exists. Results: Twenty-one participants took part in the learning session; all participants were emergency medicine residents, ranging from post-graduate year (PGY)1s to PGY-3s. Of the participants, 100% had performed fluorescein staining, 24% had performed ocular foreign body removal, 95% had performed IOP measurements utilizing a Tono-Pen, Discussion: Feedback from residents was favorable, and their comfort level with each of these ocular procedures improved after the activity. We believe this tool can offer simulation of these procedures at a relatively low cost with reusable materials to improve both comfort level and procedural competence in emergency medicine residents. Topics: Ocular procedures, lateral canthotomy, Tono-Pen,

Identifiers

PMID42110691
PMCPMC13152363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.