Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42110670›Full record

ArticleSouthern African journal of HIV medicine2026

Integrating artificial intelligence and machine learning in HIV testing interventions in Gauteng Province, South Africa: Opportunities, challenges, and implementation strategies.

Musa Jaiteh, Edith Phalane, Yegnanew A Shiferaw, Refilwe N Phaswana-Mafuya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Southern African journal of HIV medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Musa JaitehSAMRC/UJ Pan African Centre for Epidemics Research, Extramural Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6920-9919
Edith PhalaneSAMRC/UJ Pan African Centre for Epidemics Research, Extramural Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6128-2337
Yegnanew A ShiferawDepartment of Statistics, Faculty of Science, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2422-4768
Refilwe N Phaswana-MafuyaSAMRC/UJ Pan African Centre for Epidemics Research, Extramural Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9387-0432

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Conventional HIV testing approaches continue to fall short of overcoming barriers to HIV testing, especially among key and priority populations at higher risk of acquiring and transmitting HIV. Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning present a unique opportunity to strengthen prioritised HIV testing through risk prediction and enhanced diagnostic tools. Objective: This study discussed stakeholders' views on opportunities, challenges, contextual considerations and an implementation roadmap and strategic recommendations for integrating AI and machine learning into HIV testing in South Africa. Method: This qualitative study recruited 15 stakeholders in Gauteng Province, using individual semi-structured face-to-face interviews. Thematic content analysis was performed, and the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research was used to map the implementation roadmap of the results. Results: Four superordinate themes were identified: perceived benefits, challenges, ethical considerations and implementation strategies. The study discussed the opportunity to leverage AI to enhance HIV testing through HIV risk prediction, self-testing support and advanced, accurate diagnostics. However, technological access, digital divide, resource constraints, privacy concerns, skill gaps and staff resistance, among other barriers, were noted. Conclusion: The implementation design should incorporate the perspectives of all stakeholders involved in HIV testing to address human factors and ethical concerns surrounding AI use.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceconsolidated framework for implementation researchHIV testingmachine learningSouth Africa

Identifiers

PMID42110670
PMCPMC13149923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.