Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42110657›Full record

ArticleJournal of healthcare informatics research2026

Susceptibility of Large Language Models to User-Driven Factors in Medical Queries.

Kyung Ho Lim, Ujin Kang, Xiang Li, Jin Sung Kim, Young-Chul Jung, Sangjoon Park, Byung-Hoon Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of healthcare informatics research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kyung Ho Lim *Department of Psychiatry, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-Ro, Seodaemun-Gu, Seoul, 03722 Republic of Korea.
Ujin Kang *Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Yonsei University, 50-1 Yonsei-Ro, Seodaemun-Gu, Seoul, 03722 Republic of Korea.
Xiang LiCenter for Advanced Medical Computing and Analysis, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114 USA.
Jin Sung KimDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-Ro, Seodaemun-Gu, Seoul, 03722 Republic of Korea.
Young-Chul JungDepartment of Psychiatry, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-Ro, Seodaemun-Gu, Seoul, 03722 Republic of Korea.
Sangjoon ParkDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-Ro, Seodaemun-Gu, Seoul, 03722 Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-9223-3172
Byung-Hoon KimDepartment of Psychiatry, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-Ro, Seodaemun-Gu, Seoul, 03722 Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-2501-038X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used in healthcare; however, their reliability is shaped not only by model design but also by how queries are phrased and how complete the information is. This study assesses how user-driven factors, including misinformation framing, source authority, model personas, and omission of critical clinical details, influence the diagnostic accuracy and reliability of LLM-generated medical responses. Utilizing two public datasets (MedQA and Medbullets), we conducted two tests: (1) perturbation-evaluating LLM persona (assistant vs. expert AI), misinformation source authority (inexperienced vs. expert), and tone (assertive vs. hedged); and (2) ablation-omission of key clinical data. Proprietary LLMs (GPT-4o (OpenAI), Claude-3·5 Sonnet (Anthropic), Claude-3·5 Haiku (Anthropic), Gemini-1·5 Pro (Google), Gemini-1·5 Flash (Google)) and open-source LLMs (LLaMA-3 8B, LLaMA-3 Med42 8B, DeepSeek-R1 8B) were used for evaluation. Results show that in the perturbation test, all LLMs were susceptible to user-driven misinformation, with an assertive tone exerting the strongest overall impact, while proprietary models were more vulnerable to strong or authoritative misinformation. In the ablation test, omitting physical examination findings and laboratory results caused the largest accuracy decline. Proprietary models achieved higher baseline accuracy but demonstrated sharper performance drops under biased or incomplete input. These findings highlight that structured prompts and a complete clinical context are essential for accurate responses. Users should avoid authoritative misinformation framing and provide a complete clinical context, especially for complex and challenging queries. By clarifying the impact of user-driven biases, this study contributes insights to the safe integration of LLMs into healthcare practice. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41666-025-00218-4.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceBiasClinical decision support systemsDiagnostic errorsLarge language modelNatural language processing

Identifiers

PMID42110657
PMCPMC13156382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.