ArticleArchives of medical science : AMS2026
Self-assessed oral health behaviours in pregnant women: a cross-sectional study in the Polish population.
Article in Archives of medical science : AMS, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Pregnant women are at increased risk of developing caries and periodontal disease due to hormonal changes during pregnancy. The main preventive measure is health awareness and behaviours supporting oral hygiene. The aim of this study was to assess oral hygiene health behaviours of pregnant women in Poland. Material and methods: The study was conducted using the computer-assisted telephone interviewing (CATI) method, in a group of 1,000 women who were in their second or third trimester of pregnancy. The Hiroshima University Dental Behaviour Inventory (HU-DBI) questionnaire was used to assess oral health behaviours. The HU-DBI index was calculated based on 12 questions verifying the respondents' oral health attitudes and behaviour. Results: The majority of the women participating in the study (62%) assessed the condition of their teeth as good or very good. At the same time, 79.7% of the women reported a history of dental caries treatment. The mean HU-DBI index was 5.6 points. The most frequently indicated health-promoting behaviour for oral hygiene was careful oral cavity brushing. Analysis of factors influencing self-assessed oral health behaviours showed significant differences in the HU-DBI index according to financial situation and educational level. Conclusions: Access to dental care should be promoted among pregnant women, regardless of their socioeconomic status. Oral health care measures for pregnant women should include education, prophylaxis, and treatment. It is important to increase the awareness of the expectant mothers that their oral health behaviour has a very strong impact on both their and their children's health, during the fetal period and from birth on.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.