Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42110606›Full record

ArticleArchives of medical science : AMS2026

Global, regional, and national trends in spinal fracture burden from 1990 to 2021 and projections to 2050.

Ri-Peng Zhang, Xiao-Chen Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of medical science : AMS, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ri-Peng ZhangDepartment of Orthopedics, Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhangqiu Traditional Chinese Hospital, Zhangqiu, China.
Xiao-Chen LiuDepartment of Orthopedics, Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Spinal fractures (SF) remain a major global cause of disability. This study aimed to quantify the global incidence, prevalence, and burden of SF in 2021, along with temporal trends from 1990 to 2021. These trends are stratified by location, age, sex, and Socio-Demographic Index (SDI). Furthermore, the study provides projections for the burden of SF over the next 30 years. Material and methods: Data for this study were obtained from the 2021 Global Burden of Disease Study (GBD). To quantify temporal patterns and evaluate trends in age-standardized rates (ASR) of SF prevalence (ASPR), incidence (ASIR), and age-standardized years lived with disability (ASYR), estimated annual percentage changes (EAPCs) were calculated for the study period. The analyses were stratified by gender, 20 age categories, 21 GBD regions, 204 countries/territories, and 5 SDI quintiles. Statistical analyses and plot visualizations were performed using the R statistical package (version 4.4.2). Results: In 2021, the global burden of SF remained considerable, with a total of 3.4 million cases and an ASPR of 65.19 cases per 100,000 individuals (95% uncertainty interval [UI]: 56.89-75.28). The ASIR was 92.75 per 100,000 individuals (95% UI: 72.12-119.99), while the ASYR was 6.62 per 100,000 individuals (95% UI: 4.43-9.2). Regionally, the highest ASPR, ASIR, and ASYR were observed in high SDI regions, while the lowest rates were found in low SDI regions. Conclusions: Geographically, Australasia exhibited the highest ASIR and ASPR, while the Caribbean had the highest ASYR. Among countries, New Zealand had the highest ASIR, and Andorra showed the highest ASPR and ASYR.

Indexed as

GBD 2021incidenceprevalencespinal fracturesyears lived with disability

Identifiers

PMID42110606
PMCPMC13154806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.