ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Efavirenz metabolism and CNS toxicity in Ugandan children: impact of CYP2B6 genotype and plasma metabolite profiles.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pharmacogenomics and Epigenetic Regulation Transforming Pediatric Precision Therapeutics.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor efavirenz (EFV) is used in antiretroviral therapy (ART) against HIV. EFV is mainly metabolized by CYP2B6 to 8-hydroxyefavirenz (8-OH-EFV) and to a lesser extent by CYP2A6 to 7-hydroxyefavirenz (7-OH-EFV). Previous studies have only examined these metabolites in adults, indicating that EFV-hydroxy-metabolites might contribute to central nervous system (CNS) toxicity. Aims: This study aimed to quantify EFV and its metabolites including a recently identified EFV metabolite named EFAdeg in plasma and to explore their association with CYP2B6 metabolizer phenotypes and CNS adverse effects, in Ugandan children. Additionally, we examined signs of EFV autoinduction. Methods: We prospectively followed 99 Ugandan ART-naïve children in 2015-2016, aged 3-12 years with plasma sampling at 2, 6, 12, and 24 weeks after initiating-EFV-based ART. Using liquid chromatography high-resolution tandem mass spectrometry, we quantified EFV, 8-OH-EFV, 7-OH-EFV and EFAdeg in both unconjugated and conjugated forms. Genotyping for single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) in CYP2B6 and CYP2A6 was performed. CYP2B6 metabolizer phenotypes were predicted by the composite genotype of the two SNPs CYP2B6 c.516G>T and CYP2B6 c.983T>C. CNS adverse effects were assessed Results: Metabolite/EFV ratios in plasma varied significantly with CYP2B6 metabolizer phenotypes. Conjugated 8-OH-EFV (8-OH-EFV -glucuronide and 8-OH-EFV-sulfate) and conjugated EFAdeg constituted the major circulating forms of EFV in extensive and intermediate metabolizers, while the parent drug EFV dominated in slow metabolizers, who also displayed the highest levels of 7-OH-EFV. CNS symptoms were common, transient and mild and significantly associated with EFV plasma concentrations above 4,000 ng/mL and slow CYP2B6 metabolizer phenotype. None of the metabolites in plasma were associated with an increased risk of CNS toxicity. Evidence of autoinduction of EFV metabolism was observed among extensive metabolizers. Conclusion: This first study of EFV metabolites in children revealed distinct distribution patterns influenced by CYP2B6 metabolizer phenotype. Mild CNS-related adverse effects were associated with high EFV levels and slow CYP2B6 metabolizer phenotype, but not with EFV hydroxy metabolites. Autoinduction of EFV metabolism was observed in CYP2B6 extensive metabolizers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.