ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Development and validation of a clinical nomogram for predicting suboptimal concentration of valproate in pediatric with epilepsy: a retrospective study.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Valproate, a first-line anti-seizure medication, has a narrow therapeutic range of 50-100 μg/mL. Many children are prescribed insufficient doses of valproate, resulting in inadequate seizure control or potential toxicity. Currently, no predictive algorithms are available to customize treatment according to the specific needs of children. Our objective was to develop a nomogram that predicts the likelihood of suboptimal valproate concentrations in pediatric patients with epilepsy. Methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study of pediatric patients with epilepsy aged 2-18 years who were receiving valproate and had steady-state trough concentrations. The primary outcome was the identification of suboptimal valproate concentrations, defined as levels below 50 μg/mL or above 100 μg/mL. The Boruta algorithm was implemented to identify relevant characteristics from demographic, clinical, and pharmacological variables. Significant predictors identified through this process were incorporated into a multivariable logistic regression model, which was subsequently presented as a nomogram. We assessed the model's performance regarding discrimination using the area under the curve (AUC) and concordance index (C-index), calibration through a calibration plot and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test, and clinical value via decision curve analysis to guarantee robustness. Bootstrap resampling was performed for internal validation. Results: Among the 121 included patients,38 (31.4%) patients presented with suboptimal concentrations. The Boruta algorithm and multivariate regression analysis identified four predictors: daily valproate dose (mg/kg/d), acute liver injury (ALI), acute kidney injury (AKI), and the concurrent use of meropenem. The model showed excellent discrimination with an AUC of 0.911 (95% CI 0.849-0.974) and an optimism-corrected C-index of 0.902, alongside good calibration. Decision curves showed a clinical net benefit over a broad probability threshold range (3%-99%). AKI (odds ratio [OR] 16.5), meropenem use (OR 17.39), and ALI (OR 10.86) were significantly associated with suboptimal concentrations. Conclusion: We developed and internally validated a predictive nomogram that integrates dose, AKI, ALI, and meropenem use to assess the risk of suboptimal concentrations of valproate in pediatric epilepsy. This tool can aid in the early identification of high-risk patients, enabling targeted therapeutic drug monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.