In one paragraphArticle in MycoKeys, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registryThe trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literatureWho cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
4 · The recordCorrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what moneyAuthors and funding
8 authors.
Hong ZhangSchool of Food Engineering, Moutai Institute, Renhuai, 564507, China School of Food and Pharmaceutical Engineering, Guizhou Institute of Technology Guiyang China https://ror.org/05x510r30.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1894-8169 Ya-Ru SunDepartment of Light Industry and Chemical Engineering, Guizhou Light Industry Polytechnic University, Guiyang 550025, China School of Food Engineering, Moutai Institute Renhuai China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5549-1028 Yongjian LuoSchool of Food Engineering, Moutai Institute, Renhuai, 564507, China School of Food and Pharmaceutical Engineering, Guizhou Institute of Technology Guiyang China https://ror.org/05x510r30.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-2873-6972 Jiayi ZhangSchool of Food Engineering, Moutai Institute, Renhuai, 564507, China School of Food and Pharmaceutical Engineering, Guizhou Institute of Technology Guiyang China https://ror.org/05x510r30.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-7210-2630 Tianyuan FanSchool of Food Engineering, Moutai Institute, Renhuai, 564507, China School of Food and Pharmaceutical Engineering, Guizhou Institute of Technology Guiyang China https://ror.org/05x510r30.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-4175-7973 Xudong LiuSchool of Food Engineering, Moutai Institute, Renhuai, 564507, China School of Food and Pharmaceutical Engineering, Guizhou Institute of Technology Guiyang China https://ror.org/05x510r30.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1153-5898 Ning-Guo LiuSchool of Food and Pharmaceutical Engineering, Guizhou Institute of Technology, Guiyang 550025, China Guizhou Engineering Research Center for Health-Functional Liquor Brewing Technology, Moutai Institute Renhuai China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9169-2350 Yu MuSchool of Food Engineering, Moutai Institute, Renhuai, 564507, China School of Food and Pharmaceutical Engineering, Guizhou Institute of Technology Guiyang China https://ror.org/05x510r30.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0697-6229 Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
6 · The paper itselfAbstract
During a survey investigating fungal diversity in the Chishui River Basin, Guizhou Province, China, four fungal specimens were collected from submerged wood in freshwater habitats. Based on detailed morphological observations and multi-gene phylogenetic analyses, two novel species,
Indexed as
Chaetosphaeriaceaefreshwater fungiphylogenyRhamphoriaceaetaxonomy
Identifiers
PMID42110501
PMCPMC13150535
What OpenQuestion holds
Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390