ReviewFrontiers in medicine2026
Defining the abscopal effect in non-small cell lung cancer in the era of immunotherapy and lung ablation treatment: a narrative review.
Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Translating physical stress into biological signals: precision electro-oncology based on conformational changes of electro-sensitive receptors and parameterized immune remodeling.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Integrating cryoablation with immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: mechanisms, clinical evidence, and translational barriers.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The abscopal effect, first described in 1953, refers to the regression of distant, non-irradiated tumors following localized therapy. Historically considered rare, interest in this phenomenon has increased with the introduction of immunotherapy and local treatments for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This review summarizes the current evidence on the pathophysiology, clinical observations, and assessment of the abscopal effect in NSCLC following radiotherapy, lung ablation, and combined multimodality therapies. Preclinical and early clinical studies suggest that radiotherapy and ablative techniques such as cryoablation, microwave ablation, and pulsed electric field therapy may induce immunogenic cell death, leading to the release of tumor antigens and danger-associated molecular patterns that can activate systemic antitumor immune responses. When combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors, these local therapies may enhance immune activation, potentially improving both local and distant tumor control. However, recognition of abscopal effects remains inconsistent, largely due to limitations of conventional response assessment criteria. While iRECIST partly captures atypical response patterns, unequivocal out-of-field tumor regression is not systematically recorded in most clinical trials. The available evidence, primarily from preclinical models and early-phase studies, suggests that the true incidence of abscopal effects in NSCLC may be underrecognized. Accordingly, we propose a working definition of the abscopal effect in NSCLC: the regression (complete or partial response by iRECIST) of one or more non-irradiated lesions distant from the primary treatment site, occurring after localized therapy with or without systemic treatment, and confirmed by follow-up imaging within 4-8 weeks. Establishing standardized terminology and assessment criteria will be essential for accurately identifying and integrating potential abscopal responses in future NSCLC research and clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.