ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Ethical decision-making confidence among nurse leaders: a mixed-methods study of determinants and ethical implications.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: In today's complex healthcare environment, ethical decision-making confidence (EDMC) among nurse leaders plays a pivotal role in ensuring ethically sound nursing practice. While prior research has primarily emphasized ethical competence, empirical investigation of EDMC and its determinants among nurse leaders remains limited. This study aimed to assess the level of EDMC among nurse leaders in Guizhou Province and to identify its key influencing factors to inform targeted intervention strategies. Methods: A sequential explanatory mixed-methods design was adopted. In the quantitative phase, 611 nurse leaders from secondary and tertiary hospitals in Guizhou Province were recruited through convenience sampling. Data were collected using the Ethical Decision-Making Confidence Scale (EDMC), the Chinese version of the Rushton Moral Resilience Scale (RMRs), and the Hospital Ethical Climate Survey (HECS). Univariate analyses and stepwise multiple linear regression were performed to identify independent predictors of EDMC. In the qualitative phase, purposive sampling and semi-structured interviews were conducted to further explain quantitative findings, and data were analyzed using Colaizzi's seven-step method. Results: Nurse leaders demonstrated overall moderate-to-high levels of EDMC, with nearly one-third reporting insufficient confidence. Moral resilience ( Conclusion: EDMC among nurse leaders is shaped by the interaction of individual psychological resources, organizational environments, and societal influences. Although confidence levels were generally high, notable vulnerability persists in ethically complex contexts. Interventions aimed at strengthening moral resilience, improving ethical climate, and providing structured ethics training may enhance ethical decision-making confidence. By focusing on ethical decision-making confidence rather than competence alone, this study offers empirically grounded insights for leadership development and ethics education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.