Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42110427›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026

Postoperative drainage with double 8F ultrafine chest tubes improves pain control and reduces specific complications in uniportal thoracoscopic lung tumor resection: a retrospective multicenter cohort study.

Hongde Jiang, Di Wu, Zhengwei Huang, Donghui Chu, Jun Wang, Zufang Liao, Liwei Tang, Wentao Hu, Guofang Zhao, Zhengfu He and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Hongde JiangHealth Science Center, Ningbo University, Ningbo, China.
Di WuHealth Science Center, Ningbo University, Ningbo, China.
Zhengwei HuangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Donghui ChuHealth Science Center, Ningbo University, Ningbo, China.
Jun WangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, China.
Zufang LiaoDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, China.
Liwei TangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, China.
Wentao HuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, China.
Guofang ZhaoDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Ningbo Second Hospital, Ningbo, China.
Zhengfu He *Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Chenwei Li *Department of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (U-VATS) is a well-established minimally invasive approach for lung tumors, but consensus on the optimal size and number of postoperative chest tubes remains lacking. Ultrafine pigtail chest tubes may reduce tissue injury and improve wound healing compared with traditional drainage methods, yet evidence supporting their safety and feasibility in U-VATS patients is insufficient. Methods: This retrospective multicenter cohort study enrolled 1,076 lung tumor patients who underwent U-VATS across three Chinese hospitals. Patients were assigned to three groups: double 8F ultrafine chest tube ( Results: Multivariate analysis identified chest tube characteristics, pleural adhesions, postoperative infection, air leakage, intrathoracic hemorrhage, drainage volume as independent factors associated with drainage duration. After PSM (93 cases/group), the double 8F group had significantly lower NRS pain scores [postoperative days (POD) 1-3], reduced early drainage volume (POD1 and POD3), and lower incidences of atelectasis and intrathoracic hemorrhage (all Conclusion: Double 8F ultrafine chest tubes do not shorten drainage duration but effectively alleviate postoperative pain (especially on POD1), reduce early postoperative drainage volume, and lower specific complications. Aligning with enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) principles, they represent a promising drainage strategy for lung tumor patients after U-VATS.

Indexed as

1:1:1 PSMlung tumorperioperative outcomespostoperative drainageultrafine chest tubeU-VATS

Identifiers

PMID42110427
PMCPMC13154386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.