Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42110408›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026

Association between nursing execution and postoperative recovery following laparoscopic benign gynecologic surgery: a prospective observational cohort study.

Ruili Zhu, Xianling Feng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ruili ZhuHenan Provincial Key Medicine Laboratory of Nursing, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Xianling FengHenan Provincial Key Medicine Laboratory of Nursing, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS)-based perioperative care is widely implemented in gynecologic laparoscopy, yet the real-world execution of nursing practices remains highly variable, potentially contributing to differences in postoperative pain control, recovery quality, and length of stay. This study systematically quantified multidimensional nursing execution and examined its association with key postoperative outcomes. Methods: In this single-center prospective observational cohort, 339 women undergoing laparoscopic surgery for benign gynecologic conditions were enrolled. Nursing execution was assessed across four ERAS-related dimensions-preoperative education, early mobilization, pain management execution, and VTE prevention-each scored from 0 to 10 and categorized into tertiles (high, medium, low). The primary outcomes were moderate-to-severe postoperative pain (NRS ≥ 4 within 48 h) and prolonged length of stay (LOS > 3 days). Multivariable regression models were used to adjust for demographic and perioperative covariates. Results: A total of 339 patients were included and classified into high ( Conclusion: Nursing execution is a measurable and modifiable factor that significantly influences postoperative recovery in laparoscopic gynecologic surgery. Higher execution of ERAS-based nursing care was associated with less pain and fewer complications, faster recovery, and shorter hospitalization. Improving execution quality may offer an efficient and practical approach to strengthening ERAS performance in routine practice.

Indexed as

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS)functional recoverypostoperative painprospective observational cohortresearch

Identifiers

PMID42110408
PMCPMC13149466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.