Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42110396›Full record

ArticleGlobal mental health (Cambridge, England)2026

Psychometric validation and optimal cut-point determination of the Hausa WHO-5 well-being index for depression screening among internally displaced persons.

Andem Effiong Etim Duke, Raquel Crider, Bala Isa Harri, Omolayo Anjorin, Temitayo Sodunke, Asmau Mohammed Dahiru, Tunde Masseyferguson Ojo, Vincent I O Agyapong, Mark Paramlall, Linda Liebenberg and 3 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global mental health (Cambridge, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Andem Effiong Etim DukePsychiatry, Dalhousie University Faculty of Medicine, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7333-3494
Raquel CriderShepherd University, USA.
Bala Isa HarriPsychiatry, QEII Health Sciences Centre, Dalhousie University Faculty of Medicine, Canada.
Omolayo AnjorinPsychiatry, QEII Health Sciences Centre, Dalhousie University Faculty of Medicine, Canada.
Temitayo SodunkeDalhousie University Faculty of Health, Canada.
Asmau Mohammed DahiruFederal Neuropsychiatric Hospital Maiduguri, Nigeria.
Tunde Masseyferguson OjoPublic Health, National Mental Health Program, Nigeria Federal Ministry of Health, Nigeria.
Vincent I O AgyapongPsychiatry, QEII Health Sciences Centre, Dalhousie University Faculty of Medicine, Canada.
Mark ParamlallPsychiatry, QEII Health Sciences Centre, Dalhousie University Faculty of Medicine, Canada.
Linda LiebenbergPsychiatry, QEII Health Sciences Centre, Dalhousie University Faculty of Medicine, Canada.
Patrick McGrathPsychiatry, QEII Health Sciences Centre, Dalhousie University Faculty of Medicine, Canada.
Rita OrjiDalhousie University Faculty of Computer Science, Canada.
Ejemai EboreimePsychiatry, Dalhousie Medical School, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8277-2570

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Depression remains underrecognized among internally displaced persons (IDPs) in Nigeria, where access to mental health and psychosocial support is limited. This study assessed the reliability, validity, and cutoff performance of the Hausa WHO-5 Well-Being Index for identifying probable moderate-to-severe depressive symptoms among IDPs in Abuja, Nigeria. A total of 264 IDPs completed the Hausa WHO-5 and PHQ-9. Internal consistency was evaluated using ordinal Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega, factorial validity using one-factor confirmatory factor analysis with the weighted least squares mean and variance adjusted estimator, and construct validity with Spearman's correlation between Hausa WHO-5 and PHQ-9 scores. Receiver operating characteristic analysis assessed sensitivity and specificity for cutoffs of ≤28 and <50, using PHQ-9 scores ≥10 as the reference standard. The Hausa WHO-5 demonstrated excellent internal consistency and a unidimensional structure with strong loadings and excellent model fit. Scores were inversely associated with PHQ-9 scores across age and sex subgroups. Discrimination was moderate at both thresholds, and the <50 cutoff provided the best balance of sensitivity and specificity for screening, triage, and referral.

Indexed as

brief interventionsconflictdepressiondisplacementmental well-being

Identifiers

PMID42110396
PMCPMC13150781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.