ArticleGlobal mental health (Cambridge, England)2026
Psychometric validation and optimal cut-point determination of the Hausa WHO-5 well-being index for depression screening among internally displaced persons.
Article in Global mental health (Cambridge, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mental Health and Health-Related Behavioral Patterns Surrounding a Major International Sporting Event: An Observational Study.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Erratum: Psychometric validation and optimal cut-point determination of the Hausa WHO-5 well-being index for depression screening among internally displaced persons - CORRIGENDUM.Global mental health (Cambridge, England) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Depression remains underrecognized among internally displaced persons (IDPs) in Nigeria, where access to mental health and psychosocial support is limited. This study assessed the reliability, validity, and cutoff performance of the Hausa WHO-5 Well-Being Index for identifying probable moderate-to-severe depressive symptoms among IDPs in Abuja, Nigeria. A total of 264 IDPs completed the Hausa WHO-5 and PHQ-9. Internal consistency was evaluated using ordinal Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega, factorial validity using one-factor confirmatory factor analysis with the weighted least squares mean and variance adjusted estimator, and construct validity with Spearman's correlation between Hausa WHO-5 and PHQ-9 scores. Receiver operating characteristic analysis assessed sensitivity and specificity for cutoffs of ≤28 and <50, using PHQ-9 scores ≥10 as the reference standard. The Hausa WHO-5 demonstrated excellent internal consistency and a unidimensional structure with strong loadings and excellent model fit. Scores were inversely associated with PHQ-9 scores across age and sex subgroups. Discrimination was moderate at both thresholds, and the <50 cutoff provided the best balance of sensitivity and specificity for screening, triage, and referral.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.